Legal Opinion

Vela v. Shacklett

Texas Commission of Appeals

Decided January 23, 1929No. 955-5075PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeddy, J.

The note sued on' by defendants in error was payable five years after date, with interest thereon at the rate of 10 per cent, per annum, interest payable semiannually. It contained a- stipulation giving the maker the privilege of paying same at the end of three years upon payment of a sum equal to three months’ advance interest on the principal thereof.

Defendants in error admitted the execution and delivery of the note and deed of trust, presenting the sole defense of usury. It is contended that, because the Constitution of this state (article 16, § 11) provides, “contracts for a greater rate…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Meyer v. City of MuscatineSupreme Court of the United States · 1864
  2. Goodrich v. Reynolds, Wilder & Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1863
  3. Harrop v. National Loan & Investment Co. of DetroitCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. Smithwick v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1910
  5. Goodale v. WallaceSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1905

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Shropshire v. Commerce Farm Credit Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Southland Life Insurance v. EganTexas Supreme Court · 1935
  3. Tanner Development Co. v. FergusonTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Parker Plaza West Partners, a Texas General Partnership v. Unum Pension and Insurance Company, F/k/a Union Mutual Pension and Insurance CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  5. Bearden v. Tarrant Savings Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1982

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API