Legal Opinion

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided October 8, 1918No. 9590PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Motion for new trial; from city court of Floyd county—Judge Nunnally. February 11, 1918.

1Opinion of the CourtBloodworth, J.

No brief of evidence waS filed with the motion for a new trial. The hearing of the motion was set for the 3d day of October, 1917, by an order which provided “that movant have until October 3, 1917, to prepare and present for approval a brief of the evidence in said case.” On December 13, 1917, the following order, was passed: “The within motion is dismissed for want of prosecution, and for the further reason that no brief of evidence has been filed as required by law.” On December 21, 1917, the movant’s attorney filed a motion to set aside the order dismissing the motion for new trial, “1st.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Reed v. WarnockSupreme Court of Georgia · 1917
  3. Verner v. GannSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  4. Guthrie v. HendleyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1910
  5. Brooks v. Proctor & HuddlestonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Bull & Son v. Armour Fertilizer WorksCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1921
  2. Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
  3. Hicks v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API