Legal Opinion

Bull & Son v. Armour Fertilizer Works

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided January 20, 1921No. 11779PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Certiorari; from Macon superior court — -Judge Littlejohn. July 6, 1920.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. Where a motion for a new trial was filed and an order granted thereon allowing the movant until a fixed day in vacation to amend the motion and to prepare, perfect, and file a brief of the evidence, and on the day fixed no brief of the evidence was presented to the court, the motion was a mere nullity and the result is the same as if none had ever been made. Baker v. Johnson, 99 Ga. 374 (27 S. E. 706) ; Moxley v. Ga. Ry. & Electric Co., 122 Ga. 493 (50 S. E. 339); Smith v. State, 22 Ga. App. 616 (97 S. E. 96).

2, Where the final judgment was rendered against the defendants on January 29,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
  2. Moxley v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1905
  3. Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Firemen's Insurance v. OliverSupreme Court of Georgia · 1932
  2. Hitt v. City of AtlantaCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  3. Autrey & Peebles v. Carson Naval Stores Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
  4. Baggett v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1930
  5. Digsby v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API