Guthrie v. Hendley
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Motion for new trial; from city court of Nashville — Judge R. Eve presiding. December 3, 1909.
1Opinion of the CourtRussell, J.
We think that the court properly dismissed the motion for a new trial in this case. Counsel for the plaintiff in error relies upon the decision of this court in the ease of James v. *102Flannery Co., 6 Ga. App. 811 (66 S. E. 158), as sustaining his contention that the court erred in dismissing the motion. It is easily to be seen, from a comparison of the orders granted by the court in the two cases, that nothing -ruled in that case is in conflict with what we now hold. In fact 'our decisions in both cases are based upon the same principle, — to wit, that the judge’s order extending the time for…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Baker v. Johnson & HarrisSupreme Court of Georgia · 1896
- Taliaferro v. Columbus Railroad Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1908
- Pinnebad v. PinnebadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1907
- James v. John Flannery Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1909
- Humphreys v. SmithSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pope v. ShippCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1928
- Starke v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1923
- Rogers v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1912
- Smith v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1918
- Griffin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1934
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.