Sinclair v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Judge.
This case comes for decision on defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff lender argues that the Government breached its contract with him. Having not disapproved his acquisition of a small national bank, plaintiff contends that the Government agreed to his proceeding with a business plan to offer sub-prime loans. Defendant rejects the proposition that a contract was formed, denying that a meeting of the minds occurred. It is defendant’s position that the regulatory activities to which plaintiffs banking activities were subject do not satisfy the prerequisites…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal CouncilSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1982
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Night Vision Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2005
- Copar Pumice Company, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Salvador v. Bank of America, National Ass'n Ex Rel. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (In Re Salvador)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Georgia · 2011
- Vane Minerals (Us), LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
- Fifth Third Bank v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2003
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.