Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. Emigh

Montana Supreme Court

Decided April 30, 1945No. 8534PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Angstman

Plaintiffs, as owners or entitled to possession as lessees of lands described in the complaint, brought this action to restrain the defendant from interfering with fences and gates enclosing the premises and from continuing to be a nuisance to the plaintiffs and to recover damages. The complaint alleges in substance that defendant has opened gates and has cut, torn down and destroyed fences enclosing the premises described in the com plaint and allowed his mules and horses to graze upon lands owned by or in possession of the plaintiffs.

Upon the filing of the complaint the court issued an…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Light v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. Lazarus v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  3. Herrin v. SiebenMontana Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Garcia v. SumrallArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. Smith v. WilliamsMontana Supreme Court · 1874

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Thompson v. Tobacco Root Co-Op. State Grazing DistrictMontana Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Thompson v. MattuschekMontana Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Montgomery v. GehringMontana Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Legg v. BarinagaIdaho Supreme Court · 1968

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API