Legg v. Barinaga
Idaho Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, Chief Justice.
Plaintiffs, as lessees of state land, originally brought this action against defendants, seeking to test the constitutionality of I.C. § 58-313, which permits a lessee of state land to hold the land after sale for a period of two years, from December 1st “next occurring after the date of sale.” Defendants answered generally, alleging the constitutionality of the statute. Such portion of the action was resolved by a summary judgment granted against plaintiffs on their complaint and upholding the constitutionality of I.C. § 58-313. No appeal was taken from the summary…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Light v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Lazarus v. PhelpsSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- City of Bellevue v. DalyIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Taylor v. HulettIdaho Supreme Court · 1908
- Gardiner v. Eclipse Grocery Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1925
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. MyersIdaho Supreme Court · 1972
- Financial Associates, Inc. v. Hub Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
- Miller v. MillerIdaho Supreme Court · 1987
- Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
- Maguire v. YankeIdaho Supreme Court · 1978
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.