Legal Opinion
Consolidated Rail Corporation v. National Assn. of Recycling Industries, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided January 26, 1981No. 80-568PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Per curiam
Section 204 of the Railroad Revitalization and Regulatory-Reform Act of 1976, Pub. L. 94-210, 90 Stat. 40, note following 45 U. S. C. § 793, directed the Interstate Commerce Commission to conduct an investigation to determine whether the rail rate structure for recyclable and competing virgin materials unjustly discriminates against recyclables or whether such rates are unreasonable, and, if found to be so, to require the removal of any such defect from the structure. The Act demonstrated congressional concern that rail rates may have been unjustly impeding the movement of recycled materials…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures (SCRAP)Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. Wichita Board of TradeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Arrow Transportation Co. v. Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Southern Railway Co. v. Seaboard Allied Milling Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Association of Recycling Industries, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Institute of Scrap Iron and Steel, Inc., National Steel Corporation (79-1582), American Paper Institute, Inc. (79-1590), Intervenors. Institute of Scrap Iron and Steel, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Co., Intervenors. Armco, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Bethlehem Steel Corporation, Intervenor. American Paper Institute, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, National Association of Recycling Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Railway Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, National Association of Recycling Industries, Inc., Intervenors. The Aluminum Association, Inc. v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, National Association of Recycling Industries, Inc., Intervenors. Fort Howard Paper Company v. The United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, Southern Paper Traffic Conference v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Southwestern Paper Traffic Conference v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Wisconsin Paper and Pulp Manufacturers Traffic Association v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Western Paper Traffic Conference v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of America, Glass Packaging Institute v. Interstate Commerce Commission and the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Frank H. Boomer, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. At & T Corporation, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- In Re Long Distance Telecommunications Litigation. Charles Kaplan v. itt-u.s. Transmission Systems, Inc., Roger Lee v. Western Union Telegraph CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
- Neil Ellis v. Tribune Television Co., Docket No. 05-1983-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
- Southern Pacific Transportation Company, Cross-Appellees v. San Antonio, Texas, Acting by and Through Its City Public Service Board, Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. United States of America and Interstate Commerce Commission, American Paper Institute, Inc., IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.