Legal Opinion

Frank H. Boomer, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. At & T Corporation, a New York Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 3, 2002No. 02-2667PublishedCited by 149 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MANION, Circuit Judge.

Frank Boomer filed a putative class action lawsuit against AT & T, alleging that AT & T overcharged its customers for contributions to the federal Universal Services Fund. AT & T moved to compel arbitration and to dismiss or stay the pending action, arguing that after the Federal Communications Commission (“FCC”) discontinued the filing of tariffs by telecommunication providers, AT & T had entered into a Consumer Service Agreement (“CSA”) with Boomer which prohibited class actions and mandated arbitration. Boomer argued that the arbitration clause was unconscionable…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  2. Hillsborough County v. Automated Medical Laboratories, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hagner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Freightliner Corp. v. MyrickSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. MCI Telecommunications Corp. v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by149 opinions

  1. Wigod v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Retail Property Trust v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
  3. Gary Sgouros v. TransUnion CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2016
  4. Bill Hansen v. Lmb Mortgage Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
  5. McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008

144 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API