Legal Opinion

Benavidez v. CITY OF IRVING, TEX.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 15, 2009No. 3:07-CV-01850-PPublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

JORGE A. SOLIS, District Judge.

On November 6, 2007, Manuel A. Benavidez (“Plaintiff’) brought this suit against the City of Irving (“City” or “Irving”), its mayor, and its city council members (collectively, “Defendants”), challenging the legality of Irving’s at-large electoral system under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 42 U.S.C. § 1973. Plaintiff maintains that Irving’s at-large electoral system has the effect of diluting the voting power of Irving’s Hispanic voters, and thus denies them the opportunity to elect representatives of their choice. (Am. Compl.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Shaw v. RenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Rodriguez v. Harris CountyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
  2. City of Tucson v. StateArizona Supreme Court · 2012
  3. Montes v. City of YakimaDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2014
  4. Missouri State Conference of the National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Ferguson-Florissant School DistrictDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 2016
  5. Patino v. City of PasadenaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API