Legal Opinion

Rodriguez v. Harris County

District Court, S.D. Texas

Decided August 1, 2013No. Civil Action No. 4:11-2907PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

VANESSA D. GILMORE, District Judge.

In this case, Plaintiffs Edward Gonzalez, Orlando Ybarra, Patricia Gonzales, Reynaldo Guerra, Sandra Puente, Thomas Berg, and James Rodriguez (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) challenge the legality of the redistricting plan adopted by the Harris County Commissioner’s Court on August 9, 2011, known as Revised Plan A-l, which reapportions voters among Harris County’s four commissioner precincts (the “County’s Plan”). Plaintiffs claim that the County’s Plan dilutes the voting strength of politically cohesive Latinos in Harris County Commissioner’s Precinct 2…

2Cases cited69 opinions

  1. Washington v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Allen v. State Board of ElectionsSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Veasey v. PerryDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2014
  2. James Rodriguez v. Harris County, Texas, etCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2015
  3. Patino v. City of PasadenaDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
  4. Perez v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017
  5. Perez v. AbbottDistrict Court, W.D. Texas · 2017

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API