Legal Opinion
Fong v. United States
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 2, 1957No. Civ. Nos. 7177, 7178, 7180PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALBERT, District Judge.
These three actions arise out of the deaths of three persons, occurring when the car in which they were riding plunged into the Sacramento River near the Paintersville Bridge. From the al*387legations of the complaints, it appears that the United States, defendant in all three actions, was in the process of conducting repair and improvement operations on the levee upon which was the road, which was traveled by the decedents prior to the tragedy. The United States is sued under the provisions of the Federal Tort Claims Act (28 U.S. G.A. §§ 1346(a), and 2671 et seq.), on the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peters v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
- Glens Falls Indemnity Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1955
- Adams v. White Bus LineCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Dow v. Sunset Telephone & Telegraph Co.California Supreme Court · 1912
- United States v. State of ArizonaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Huggins v. GravesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1964
- Banks v. City of EmeryvilleDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1985
- Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. Royal Crown Bottling Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Sales, Inc. v. Ralston Steel Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1959
- Eberle v. SutorCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.