Legal Opinion

Hartford National Bank & Trust Co. v. DiFazio

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 25, 1986No. 3120PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBieluch, J.

This appeal arises out of the second trial on the defendants’ counterclaim against the plaintiff bank.1 The defendants claim as error the trial judge’s failure to recuse himself and a variety of subsequent evidentiary issues arising out of the retrial. We find no error.

The defendants, Paul T. DiFazio and his mother, Edith A. DiFazio, were the owners of a five building apartment complex located in the city of Hartford known as Broadview Gardens. The plaintiff bank financed construction by a mortgage loan on the com*578plex. In 1973, as a result of increasing losses from the project, the DiFazios…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Papa v. New Haven Federation of TeachersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. Cameron v. CameronSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  3. Krattenstein v. G. Fox & Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  4. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers Local 35 v. Commission on Civil RightsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  5. Collins v. LewisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. BergerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1999
  2. Munson v. United Technologies Corp.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. O'Coin v. Woonsocket Institution Trust Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1988
  4. Chieffalo v. Norden Systems, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1998
  5. State v. Eric T.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API