Legal Opinion

Nederhood v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co.

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1994No. Docket Nos. 94110, 94299, (Calendar Nos. 3-4)Published

1Opinion of the Court

445 Mich. 234 (1994)

518 N.W.2d 390

NEDERHOOD

v.

CADILLAC MALLEABLE IRON COMPANY

ZIMMERMAN

v.

CADILLAC MALLEABLE IRON COMPANY

Docket Nos. 94110, 94299, (Calendar Nos. 3-4).

Supreme Court of Michigan.

Argued October 5, 1993.

Decided May 31, 1994.

Bott & Spencer, P.C. (by Timothy J. Bott), for the plaintiff.

Russell & Carowitz (by Fanny L. Vail) for the defendant.

BRICKLEY, J.

We granted leave in these cases to determine whether the Worker's Compensation Appeal Board and the Court of Appeals erred in concluding that the plaintiffs-appellants were disqualified from receiving worker's compensation benefits…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Medo Photo Supply Corp. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
  2. McClelland v. Climax Hosiery MillsNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  3. Holden v. Ford Motor Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Bower v. Whitehall Leather Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Shiffer v. Board of Education of Gibraltar School DistrictMichigan Supreme Court · 1974

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API