Legal Opinion

Ingraham Co. v. Local 260, International Union of Electrical, Radio & MacHine Workers

District Court, D. Connecticut

Decided March 10, 1959No. Civ. 7629PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ANDERSON, District Judge.

On June 17, 1957 the plaintiff, The In-graham Company of Bristol, Connecticut, entered into a collective bargaining agreement with Local 260, International Union of Electrical, Radio and Machine Workers, AFL-CIO, representing plaintiff’s employees. Article XIII provided for grievance procedure and arbitration. In 1958, during the life of the agreement, a dispute arose about the work which might be performed by a supervisor. As a final step in the grievance procedure arbitrators were appointed and on November 4, 1958 the following questions were submitted to them for…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  4. McCarroll v. Los Angeles County District Council of CarpentersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Local 205, United Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers of America (Ue) v. General Electric Company (Telechron Department, Ashland, Massachusetts)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Minkoff v. Scranton Frocks, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1959
  2. Drexel Burnham Lambert, Inc. v. Valenzuela BockDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  3. Springer v. Powder Power Tool Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Safeway Stores, Inc. v. Brotherhood of TeamstersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
  5. Swift & Company v. United Packinghouse WorkersDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1959

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API