Legal Opinion
Swift & Company v. United Packinghouse Workers
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided September 3, 1959No. Civ. A. 6484PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ARRAJ, District Judge.
The issue to be decided, whether plaintiff’s Motion to Remand should be granted, is simple to state but difficult to determine. The disposition to be -made of the motion again demonstrates the delicate nature of the relationship between the federal and state governments and the exigency for clarifying legislation in this field which profoundly affects our economic and political lives.
Plaintiff instituted an action in the District Court in and for the City and County of Denver, State of Colorado. The Complaint named as defendants the United Packinghouse Workers Union, its…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- American Fire & Casualty Co. v. FinnSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Romero v. International Terminal Operating Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Garner v. Teamsters, Chauffeurs & Helpers Local Union No. 776Supreme Court of the United States · 1954
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Atkinson v. Sinclair Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Leonardis v. Local 282 Pension Trust FundDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1975
- Sheeder v. Eastern Express, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1974
- Couch v. Prescolite Manufacturing CorporationDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1961
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.