Legal Opinion
Springer v. Powder Power Tool Corp.
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided January 27, 1960PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McAllister, c. j.
This is an action on behalf of three former employees of the defendant, Powder Power Tool Corporation, to recover wages claimed to be due because of a retroactive pay increase granted by a collective bargaining agreement between the defendant and the union representing its employees. The three employees assigned their claims to plaintiff who brought the action as assignee. The circuit court tried the case without a jury and found for the defendant. Plaintiff appeals.
As a result of an election held on March 27, 1953, District Lodge No. 24 of the International Association of…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Textile Workers v. Lincoln Mills of Ala.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
- J. I. Case Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Board of Comm'rs of Jackson Cty. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Association of Westinghouse Salaried Employees v. Westinghouse Electric Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
- Jerome v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Local 174, Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen & Helpers v. Lucas Flour Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- State Troopers Fraternal Assoc. of NJ, Inc. v. StateSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1997
- Wheeler v. White Rock Bottling Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1961
- Barclay v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1974
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.