Legal Opinion

State v. McGee

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided March 3, 1980No. 18-736, CA 15539PublishedCited by 5 opinions

SCHWAB, C. J.

1Opinion of the CourtSchwab, C. J.

Defendant seeks reversal of his conviction of possession of marijuana. He correctly contends that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, because the affidavit in support of the search warrant was insufficient to establish probable cause.

The only operative facts recited in the affidavit supporting issuance of the warrant are that (1) a confidential reliable informant was in defendant’s residence "within the past 48 hours” and that (2) while there he observed "a quantity of marijuana.”

In State v. Kittredge/Anderson, 36 Or App 603, 585 P2d 423 (1978), we found a similar…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. IngramOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. State v. KittredgeCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. MiebachCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  2. State v. HuffCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. State v. MephamCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. State v. GribskovCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  5. State v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API