Legal Opinion
State v. Martin M.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 4, 2013No. AC 34246PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVINE, J.
The defendant, Martin M., appeals from the judgment of the trial court denying his motion to correct an illegal sentence, which he filed pursuant to Practice Book § 43-22. On appeal, the defendant claims that his sentence was imposed in an illegal manner because the court imposed sentence on the basis of (1) his kidnapping conviction in this action, which was *142reversed, (2) inaccurate information that sexual offenders collectively have relatively higher rates of recidivism and (3) an alleged postjudgment factual finding that he was a “sexual predator.” The defendant asks this…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- State v. KitchensSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2011
- United States v. Gerald Vontsteen, A/K/A Skip VontsteenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- State v. DeJesusSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
- State v. ColletteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State v. EvansSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2018
- State v. FrancisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- Dumas v. Commissioner of CorrectionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2016
- State v. BischoffConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. RuizConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.