State v. Bischoff
Connecticut Appellate Court
1Per curiam
*254 *120 The defendant, Haji Jhmalah Bischoff, appeals from the judgment of the trial court dismissing his motion to correct an illegal sentence. After reviewing the record and the parties' briefs, we conclude that the defendant's claim is barred by appellate precedent. We further conclude that the form of the judgment is improper, and, accordingly, we reverse the judgment dismissing the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence and remand the case to the trial court with direction to render judgment denying the defendant's motion.
*121 The defendant was convicted of possession of heroin in…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- State v. Martin M.Connecticut Appellate Court · 2013
- State v. OsuchConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
- State v. Carlos P.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. HoughtalingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2017
- State v. MontanezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. BischoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2021
- State v. VasquezConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- State v. LanierConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021
- State v. BischoffSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2019
- State v. SantiagoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021