Legal Opinion
State v. Ruiz
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided June 6, 2017No. AC38025PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMullins, J.
The state appeals from the judgment of the trial court granting in part the defendant's motion to correct an illegal sentence. In reliance on State v. Victor O. , 320 Conn. 239 , 128 A.3d 940 (2016) ( Victor O. II ), and State v. Jason B. , 320 Conn. 259 , 128 A.3d 937 (2016), the state claims that the trial court improperly held that the defendant's original sentence was illegal because it did not include a period of special parole. The defendant, Jesus Ruiz, cross appeals from the judgment of the trial court. The defendant claims that the court resentenced him to a total effective sentence…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Rivers v. Roadway Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kuhn v. Fairmont Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1910
- Cobham v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- State v. TaboneSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
- Washington v. Commissioner of CorrectionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2008
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. PecorConnecticut Appellate Court · 2018
- State v. YoungConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
- Kevin R. George v. Robert L. WilkieUnited States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2019
- State v. HeathConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017
- State v. HeathConnecticut Appellate Court · 2017