Legal Opinion

In re Kylstra

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided February 8, 1937No. Patent Appeal No. 3750PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

The application for patent here at issue, filed in the United States Patent Office April 11, 1932, is entitled “For Improvement in Ammunition Counters.” At its outset, the specification recites that the alleged invention relates to military equipment, “specifically to machine guns such as are mounted upon airplanes,” but the claims themselves are not so specifically limited. Patentability was denied by the ‘ examiner in view of prior art cited and the Board of Appeals affirmed his decision. The instant appeal to this court followed.

There are four claims, numbered,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Potts v. CreagerSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. In re WeingartnerCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1932
  3. In re BurrowsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930
  4. In re LuksCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1934
  5. In re ReichelCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1936

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Gustave W. Borkland v. Svend Pedersen and Borghild Pedersen, Etc., D/B/A Paramount Plastics Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  2. Application of Alleyne C. Howell, JrCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962
  3. Endevco Corporation v. Chicago Dynamic Industries, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1967
  4. Application of Marvin C. Van Wanderham, Warren W. Worthley and Carl R. ComolliCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1967
  5. Application of Marion L. SmitleyCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API