Legal Opinion
Fowler v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided February 2, 1944No. 29490PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBell, J.
As we view this case the right of appellant to recover from the insurer is dependent upon whether the administrator of the assured fully complied with the terms of the policy which imposed liability upon the insurer.
In Stacey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New York, 114 Ohio St., 633, 151 N. E., 718, paragraph three of the syllabus reads:
“By the provisions of Section 9510-4, General Code, a judgment creditor is entitled to a direct action against the insurance company after obtaining a judgment against the assured and after the lapse of 30 days after judgment is rendered, provided that any…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Luntz v. SternOhio Supreme Court · 1939
- Stacey v. Fidelity & Casualty Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1926
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. RandallOhio Supreme Court · 1932
- Morgenthaler v. CohenOhio Supreme Court · 1921
3Cited by10 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Great Northern Savings Co. v. IngarraOhio Supreme Court · 1981
- In Re Estate of HoweOhio Court of Appeals · 1958
- Hendershot v. FerkelOhio Supreme Court · 1946
- Simmons v. Bartley, Court of Common Pleas of Ohio, Franklin County, Civil Division1960
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.