Morgenthaler v. Cohen
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
In the voluminous bill of exceptions there is included a very large amount of evidence, oral and documentary, much of which is not important in the solution of the material issues in the case. No finding of facts was made by the court of appeals, but it is stated in its entry that the issues joined were found in favor of the plaintiff and that the equities were with the plaintiff. It ¶ was the duty of the court of appeals to weigh the evidence, and in obedience to its familiar rule this court will accept the conclusions of the court of appeals on that feature of the case.
In addition to its…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Postal Telegraph Cable Co. v. City of NewportSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- People's Savings Bank v. BatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- N. Rogers & Sons v. BatchelorSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
- Central Trust Co v. West India Improvement Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Fairbanks v. . SargentNew York Court of Appeals · 1887
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n of Toledo v. Perry's Landing, Inc.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Cohen v. GoldbergerOhio Supreme Court · 1923
- State, Ex Rel. v. BigelowOhio Supreme Court · 1941
- Fowler v. State Automobile Mutual Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1944
- Porter v. ReidDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.