Stockmeier v. Bd. of Parole Comm'rs

which directs respondent to consider "[t]he seriousness of the offense and the history of criminal conduct of the prisoner," because the victim's family members' statements did not relate to the actual offense of conviction or to any acts for which he had been charged or which had been adjudicated against him. Additionally, he contended that the testimony could not be considered under both subsection (c) and subsection (e) of NRS 213.1099(2) because to do so constituted impermissible double counting of the evidence. Having considered the parties' arguments and the appellate record, we…