Legal Opinion

Cooper v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided May 13, 1914PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Civil action for wrongfully arresting and maliciously prosecuting the plaintiff, a boy at one time in the employ of the defendant railway company.(579) A number of issues were submitted, which it is unnecessary to set out, as the case is to be tried again. There was a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff, and the defendants appealed. A number of unnecessary issues were submitted in this case. As the action is evidently one to recover damages for wrongfully arresting and maliciously prosecuting plaintiff, the fourth and fifth issues were unnecessary, and should not have been submitted.

It…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sawyer v. RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Kelly Springfield Tire Co. v. LesterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Dickerson v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  4. West v. . Grocery Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  5. Barbee v. . CannadySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1926

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  2. Cole v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  3. Kelly v. Newark Shoe Stores Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Dickerson v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Perkins v. LangdonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API