Legal Opinion

State v. Cook

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 27, 1968No. 258PublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHusKiNS, J.

Defendants were convicted of violating G.S. 90-113.2(3) which makes it unlawful “for any person to possess a barbiturate or stimulant drug unless such person obtained such barbiturate or stimulant drug in good faith on the prescription of a practitioner . . .” licensed to prescribe or dispense such drugs. Any person violating this statute, or any person who conspires, aids, abets or procures another to violate it, is, for the first offense, guilty of a misdemeanor. G.S. 90-113.7.

Defendants assign as error that: (1) the search warrant was not issued by one legally authorized to do so and…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. State v. CutlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. State v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  3. State v. OvermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  4. People v. MooreCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
  5. State v. . BrodieSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. State v. GoinesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
  2. State v. McKinneySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1975
  3. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  4. State v. SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  5. State v. FletcherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API