Legal Opinion
Fowler v. Pebble Hill Building Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 5, 1986PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
— In action No. 2, by an insurer to recover, as the subrogee of its insureds Dean and Charlotte Fowler, amounts it has paid or may be required to pay to them, as a result of the negligence of the defendants, the plaintiff Arnica Mutual Insurance Company appeals, as limited by its brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (De Luca, J.), entered August 1, 1984, as granted that branch of the cross motion of the defendant Pebble Hill Building Corporation which was for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, and which granted the application of the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Hamilton Fire Insurance v. GregerNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JackoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- American Surety Co. v. DiamondNew York Court of Appeals · 1956
- Glens Falls Insurance v. WoodNew York Court of Appeals · 1960
- Ross v. Pawtucket Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hill v. Metropolitan Suburban Bus AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. SchwartzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1997
- Brinks, Inc. v. Commercial Union InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Federal Insurance v. HansenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990