Legal Opinion
Ross v. Pawtucket Mutual Insurance
New York Court of Appeals
Decided November 27, 1963PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
An automobile owned by Nat Boss was damaged in a collision with one owned by Tillie Moss and operated by her husband. The defendant insurance company had issued a policy insuring Boss’ car against collision and, when Boss and the company were unable to agree as to the amount of damages, a suit was instituted by Boss upon the policy. . After answering the complaint, the insurance company served a third-party complaint against Maurice and Tillie Moss, alleging that it was their negligence which caused the collision. Upon motion made pursuant to rule 106 of the former Buies of Civil Practice,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- McGrath v. . Carnegie Trust Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1917
- American Surety Co. v. PalmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Madison Avenue Properties Corp. v. Royal InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1953
3Cited by8 opinions
- Pandora Industries, Inc. v. Paramount Communications Inc. (In Re Wingspread Corp.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1992
- LUMBERMENS MUTUAL CASUALTY COMPANY v. Borden CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1965
- Seven Sixty Travel, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1977
- Fowler v. Pebble Hill Building Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.