Legal Opinion
Nationwide Mutual Insurance v. Schwartz
Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York
Decided March 19, 1997PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Memorandum.
Order unanimously reversed, without costs, and complaint dismissed as to appellants.
Plaintiff instituted this action to recover additional personal injury protection benefits (hereinafter APIP) paid to its insureds from November 21, 1991 until July 29, 1992, for a total sum of $5,447.35. The subrogation agreement executed by plaintiff’s insured Rita Bruskin on November 25,1991 indicates that the automobile accident upon which the claim for extended economic benefits was based occurred on December 20, 1987. An apparently timely action was commenced against the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Motor Vehicle Accident Indemnification Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Winkelmann v. Excelsior InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Federal Insurance v. Arthur Andersen & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1990
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. JackoweAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Seven Sixty Travel, Inc. v. American Motorists InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Parks v. Progressive Northern Insurance (In Re Hokanson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Kansas · 2008
- Dorchester Insurance Company and Janak Ramchandani v. Renzo R. OdiottSuperior Court of The Virgin Islands · 2026
- Empire Insurance v. Eagle InsuranceAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2004
- Walker v. SteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003