Legal Opinion

In Re Baert

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 26, 1988No. B036262PublishedCited by 54 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ARABIAN, J.

Introduction

“No one can be criminally punished in this country, except according to a law prescribed for his government by the sovereign authority before the imputed offense was committed, and which existed as a law at the time.” (Kring v. Missouri (1882) 107 U.S. 221, 235 [27 L.Ed. 506, 511, 2 S.Ct. 443].) Guided by this fundamental principle of due process, we confront the question, not yet addressed in the wake of People v. Anderson (1987) 43 Cal.3d 1104 [240 Cal.Rptr. 585, 742 P.2d 1306], whether its holding eliminating intent to kill as an element of the felony-murder…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Gregg v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Enmund v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  3. Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  4. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  5. Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by54 opinions

  1. People v. AriasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  2. People v. WhartonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  3. People v. AshmusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  4. People v. HinesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  5. People v. FierroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API