Legal Opinion

People v. Duran

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 30, 2002No. B147984PublishedCited by 78 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ALDRICH, J.

I

Introduction

After a jury trial, defendants and appellants Antonio Duran and Jesus Fonseca were each convicted of two counts of robbery. Duran was also convicted of evading a police officer. The jury found firearm and street gang enhancements true, and the trial court sentenced Duran and Fonseca to prison terms of 23 years and 33 years, 4 months, respectively.

In the published portion of this opinion, we consider and reject appellants’ contentions that the evidence was insufficient to prove the robberies were undertaken for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  2. People v. GardeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
  3. People v. HoltCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. CummingsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  5. People v. HillhouseCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by78 opinions

  1. People v. LeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  3. People v. KillebrewCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
  4. People v. HillCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
  5. People v. LopezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2005

73 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API