Legal Opinion
Barrer v. Metropolitan Life Insurance
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 16, 2001No. 2:99-cv-03947PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
Metropolitan Life Insurance Company now moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56 on Plaintiffs’ Complaint for Declaratory Judgment. For the reasons enumerated below, the motion shall be granted.
History of the Case
On or about January 26, 1961, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company (“Met Life”) issued a whole life insurance policy on the life of Sidney Barrer, then age 37, in the face amount of $100,000. Premiums were payable annually, in the amount of $2,752.50 on the anniversary date of the policy until the anniversary following the…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Goodman v. Mead Johnson & Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- Standard Venetian Blind Co. v. American Empire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- West v. Lincoln Benefit Life Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007
- Jazmin Ortiz v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2026
- West v. Lincoln BenefitCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2007