Legal Opinion
Shenango Cable TV, Inc. v. Tandy Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 10, 1986No. Civ. A. 83-2576PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
SIMMONS, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Shenango Cable TV, Inc. and Variety Cable TV, Inc. (hereinafter “Shenango”), two affiliated cable television companies, allege that Defendant, Tandy Corporation, through its Radio Shack Division (hereinafter “Tandy”), is manufacturing, distributing and retailing a cable television converter known as the “Archer Converter” in violation of § 705 (formally § 605) of the Communications Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 605 and § 633 of the Cable Communications Policy Act of 1984, 47 U.S.C. § 553. Shenango and Tandy now move for summary judgment under…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. Diebold, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Fireman's Insurance Company of Newark, New Jersey v. Raymond DufresneCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Allen B. Dumont Laboratories, Inc. v. CarrollCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- On/tv of Chicago v. Archie Ward JulienCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1985
- Sarah Viger v. Commercial Insurance Company of Newark, New JerseyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- International Cablevision, Inc. D/B/A Adelphia Cable v. John Sykes and Marvin NoelCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States v. Richard A. GardnerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
- Cablevision Systems Corp. v. MuneyyirciDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1994
- International Cablevision, Inc. v. NoelDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1994
- Allarcom Pay Television, Ltd. v. General Instrument Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.