Legal Opinion
Lumber Mutual Casualty Insurance v. Friedman
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 5, 1941PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBenvenga, J.
Upon the trial of this action decision was reserved on defendants’ motion to dismiss the complaint.
Concededly the plaintiff, in 1937, obtained a judgment by default against the defendant J. & B. Friedman, Inc., in the sum of $26,310.50. With the exception of a few hundred dollars the judgment remains unpaid. The action was one to recover dam*704ages for a breach of contract, based on false and fraudulent representations relating to the amount of premium due on workmen’s compensation and public liability insurance policies. The fraud perpetrated in the performance of the contract consisted in…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Friederichsen v. RenardSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- Conrow v. . LittleNew York Court of Appeals · 1889
- Merry Realty Co. v. Shamokin & Hollis Real Estate Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Cohen v. City Company of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Perkins v. Benguet Consolidated Mining Co.California Court of Appeal · 1942
- Sofi Classic S.A. de C.V. v. HurowitzDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2006
- MBIA Insurance v. Patriarch Partners VIII, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- Collomb v. Wyatt (In Re Wyatt)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- Intelsat USA Sales Corp. v. Juch-Tech, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2014
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.