Legal Opinion

United States v. Michael L. Enas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 29, 2001No. 99-10049PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by Judge McKEOWN; Concurrence by Judge PREGERSON.

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge:

This case sits at the intersection of two complicated bodies of law: the dual sovereignty exception to double jeopardy, and the sovereign power of Indian tribes. We must determine whether an Indian tribe and the federal government may twice prosecute a “non-member Indian”1 for the same conduct without offending the Double Jeopardy Clause. Our answer lies in the distinction between the “inherent” and “delegated” power of Indian tribes. If the tribe was acting pursuant to its inherent power when it prosecuted Enas,…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
  2. Huddleston v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. City of Boerne v. FloresSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Morton v. MancariSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  5. Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. United States v. LaraSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  2. United States v. Male Juvenile (Pierre Y.)Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  3. Newdow v. Rio Linda Union School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  4. McDonald v. MeansCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  5. United States v. Efrain Becerra-GarciaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API