Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Means

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided August 14, 2002No. Nos. 00-36166, 00-35002PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

The Petition for Rehearing in No. 00-35002 is denied and the Suggestion for Rehearing En Banc in No. 00-35002 is denied. The opinion issued August 14, 2002 is amended, and Judge Wallace amends his dissent. The amendments to the opinion are as follows:

1. In the first sentence of the first paragraph on page 11924 [300 F.3d 1037, 1040], replace the word “broad” with the word “considerable.”

2. Delete the second sentence in the first paragraph on page 11924 [300 F.3d at 1040] and its accompanying citation to Iowa Mutual [Ins. Co. v. LaPlante, 480 U.S. 9, 107 S.Ct. 971, 94 L.Ed.2d 10 (1987)]…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rodriguez De Quijas v. Shearson/American Express, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Agostini v. FeltonSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  5. Williams v. LeeSupreme Court of the United States · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Water Wheel Camp Recreational Area, Inc. v. LaranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  2. Nord v. KellyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Norton v. Ute Indian Tribe of the Uintah & Ouray ReservationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
  4. Wapato Heritage, L.L.C. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
  5. State v. CummingsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2004

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API