Legal Opinion

Microsoft Corp. v. Motorola, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided October 22, 2012No. Case No. C10-1823JLRPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

JAMES L. ROBART, District Judge.

I. INTRODUCTION

Microsoft Corporation (“Microsoft”) moves to exclude testimony of Charles R. Donohoe and Dr. R. Sukumar. (Microsoft Mot. (Dkt. # 396).) Mr. Donohoe is an expert who offers his opinion as to a reasonable and non discriminatory (“RAND”) royalty for Defendants Motorola, Inc., Motorola Mobility, Inc., and General Instrument Corporation’s (collectively, “Motorola”). Dr. Sukumar conducted a survey on behalf of Motorola regarding “usage and valuation of certain features offered in Microsoft’s Xbox 360 console,” namely H.264 and 802.11 capability.…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  3. General Electric Co. v. JoinerSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
  4. Clicks Billiards Inc., a Texas Corporation v. Sixshooters Inc., an Arizona Corporation Ronald R. Forbes, a Married Man Jane Doe Forbes, WifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
  5. Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. United States Plywood Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1970

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2015
  2. In re Conagra Foods, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2014
  3. Hadley v. Kellogg Sales Co.District Court, N.D. California · 2018
  4. In re NJOY, Inc. Consumer Class Action LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2015
  5. TV Interactive Data Corp. v. Sony Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2013

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API