Farmers Dev. Co. v. Rayado L. & I. Co.
New Mexico Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT-
BRICE, District Judge
(after stating the facts as above). The acts of appellant prior to its application on May 27, 1907, were ineffective because, first, ap-pellee’s work of the same character was prior in time; and, second, appellant’s claim is based upon its application of May 27, 1907. Its priorities, if any, are of that date. The letters, maps, etc., filed by appellee with the territorial irrigátion engineer prior to the enactment of..chapter 49 of the Laws of 1907, were not effective in initiating a claim for the appropriation of water. Section 19 of chapter 102 of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- MINOR v. the Mechanics Bank of AlexandriaSupreme Court of the United States · 1828
- United States Ex Rel. Siegel v. ThomanSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Board of Commissioners v. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
- De Necochea v. CurtisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Murray v. TingleyMontana Supreme Court · 1897
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Reynolds v. MendenhallNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- Jones v. FriedmanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
- State Ex Rel. Sun Co. v. VigilNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. Martinez v. McDermettNew Mexico Court of Appeals · 1995
- Nevarez v. State Armory BoardNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1972
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.