Legal Opinion

Thiesen v. Gulf, Florida & Alabama Railway Co.

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 3, 1917PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Per curiam

In an action to recover damages for filling in from the shore line towards the channel opposite plaintiff’s land upon the waters of Pensacola Bay in Esambia County, Florida, the court directed a verdict for the defendants and the plaintiff took writ of error to the final judgment for the defendants.

The statute under which the action is brought is as follows:

“643. An act entitled ‘An act to benefit commerce, approved December 27, 1856, and the grants therein made shall remain in force, which act is as follows:
“ ‘Whereas it is for the benefit of commerce that wharves be built and warehouses…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bass v. RamosSupreme Court of Florida · 1909
  2. Merrill-Stevens Co. v. DurkeeSupreme Court of Florida · 1911
  3. Ker & Co. v. CoudenSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
  4. Alden v. PinneySupreme Court of Florida · 1868

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Florida Department of Environmental ProtectionSupreme Court of the United States · 2010
  2. Hilt v. WeberMichigan Supreme Court · 1930
  3. Brickell v. TrammelSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  4. Hayes v. BowmanSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. City of Miami v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1920

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API