Legal Opinion
Pierson v. United States
District Court, D. Delaware
Decided February 9, 1977No. Civ. A. 75-218PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAY M. SCHWARTZ, District Judge.
This case arises out of the retroactive revocation by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue (“Commissioner”) of two private letter rulings issued previously to Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”) in connection with a corporate acquisition of Hartford by International Telephone and Telegraph Corporation (“ITT”). 1 Plaintiff has filed a Motion to Compel seeking the production of 287 documents currently in the defendant’s possession, as well as an order requiring answers or more complete answers to 36 interrogatories propounded by plaintiff to…
2Cases cited34 opinions
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Abbott Laboratories v. GardnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- United States v. NixonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- National Labor Relations Board v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Scott Paper Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1996
- Exxon Corp. v. Department of EnergyDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1981
- United States v. Joseph F. O'Neill and Frank A. ScafidiCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1980
- United States v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.District Court, District of Columbia · 1979
- Wei v. BodnerDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.