Radford v. City of Seattle
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtMackintosh, J.
This is a, personal injury action arising out of a collision between a street car owned *446and operated by tbe appellant and an automobile owned by tbe respondent and operated at tbe time by tbe respondent wife. Trial resulted in a verdict in favor of tbe respondents, upon wbicb judgment was entered and appeal is taken.
Tbe first point urged on bebalf of tbe appeal is that tbe evidence of appellant’s negligence was insufficient to warrant its submission to a jury and that tbe respondent’s contributory negligence was established, and consequently appellant’s challenge to tbe sufficiency of tbe…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Snyder v. SmithWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Dodge v. SalingerWashington Supreme Court · 1923
- Coons v. Olympia Light & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1920
- Hullin v. Seattle Taxicab Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1922
- Sparling v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Lung v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927
- Fisher v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1928
- Stidell v. DavidsonWashington Supreme Court · 1927
- Hoyt v. WilsonWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Isitt v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926