Legal Opinion

Queen v. Washington Water Power Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 6, 1924No. 18069PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtPemberton, J.

Respondent recovered judgment for damages resulting from injuries received by bis *554automobile' being struck by a street car at the street intersection of Rich avenue and Addison street, in the city of Spokane. The street car track runs north and south upon Addison street. Respondent was proceeding westerly along Rich avenue; At the time of the accident, there was a severe snow storm. When respondent reached Standard street, about sis hundred feet east of Addison street, he stopped his automobile for the purpose of determining his bearing. He wiped the snow from his windshield and observed that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Estes v. BabcockWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Goldsby v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  3. Nabours v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Plastino v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Reed v. Tacoma Railway & Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Isitt v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API