Legal Opinion

Corcoran v. Sanner

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided March 25, 1993No. 92CA0468PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge ROTHENBERG.

Plaintiff, Paul G. Corcoran, appeals from the judgment of the trial court entered in favor of defendants, Michael L. Sanner, Karl Hochtl, Steve Beck, and Homestake Builders Corporation. We affirm in part, reverse in part, and remand with directions.

In 1990, plaintiff hired defendant Sanner, an architect, to design and draw the plans and specifications for remodeling work to be done to plaintiff’s condominium. The remodeling included refinishing the ceiling from a popcorn-type finish to a smooth one.

Plaintiff entered into an oral agreement with defendant Homestake…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Zippo Manufacturing Company v. Rogers Imports, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1963
  2. The Prudential Insurance Company of America v. Gibraltar Financial Corporation of California, and Gibraltar Savings & Loan AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
  3. Connes v. Molalla Transport System, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1992
  4. Toys "R" US, Inc. v. Canarsie Kiddie Shop, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983
  5. United Blood Services v. QuintanaSupreme Court of Colorado · 1992

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Huntoon v. TCI Cablevision of Colorado, Inc.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1998
  2. Smith Ex Rel. Boston v. Arthur Andersen LLPDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2001
  3. Haney v. Castle Meadows, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1993
  4. Oliver v. Amity Mutual Irrigation Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1999
  5. Katz v. City of AuroraDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2000

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API