Legal Opinion
Haney v. Castle Meadows, Inc.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided November 30, 1993No. Civ. A. 93-K-322PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS TO DISMISS
KANE, Senior District Judge.
This matter is before me on the separate motions to dismiss by defendants Castle Meadows, Inc. (“CMI”), the Resolution Trust Corporation in its corporate capacity (“RTC Corporate”) and the Resolution Trust Corporation in its capacity as receiver of the Lincoln Sayings and Loan Association, F.A. (“RTC Receiver”). Each defendant asserts separate reasons why the complaint, or certain claims therein, should be dismissed. For the reasons outlined below, I grant CMI’s motion to dismiss in part and deny it in part, grant RTC Corporate’s motion…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Hishon v. King & SpaldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Williams v. MeeseCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1991
- Wisniewski v. Johns-Manville Corp.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Field v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Taggart v. Ford Motor Credit Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- S Development Co. v. Pima Capital Management Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Cross Oil Co. v. Phillips Petroleum Co.District Court, E.D. Missouri · 1996
- Loughlin v. United StatesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- Hoxeng v. Topeka Broadcomm, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 1996
- Haney v. Castle Meadows, Inc.District Court, D. Colorado · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.