Legal Opinion
Broderick v. Jackman
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided August 13, 1974PublishedCited by 40 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtLoiselle, J.
The complaint in this negligence action alleged July 11, 1970, .as the date of injury. The writ was returnable on the first Tuesday of November, 1972, and was filed on October 3, 1972. The amended complaint further alleged that the action was brought “pursuant to Section 52-592 of the General Statutes, which in pertinent part provides : ‘If any action . . . has failed to be tried on its merits . . . because the writ . . . has been erased from the docket . . . , the plaintiff . . . may commence a new action for the same cause at .any time within one year after the determination of the original…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Consolidated Motor Lines, Inc. v. M & M Transportation Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1941
- Blakeslee v. Board of Water CommissionersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1927
- Ross Realty Corp. v. SurkisSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- Middletown Trust Co. v. Middletown National BankSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1929
- Senior v. HopeSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1968
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by40 opinions
- Lacasse v. BurnsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- McGaffin v. RobertsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Fraser v. HenningerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1977
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Converse v. General Motors Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.