Legal Opinion

Lindekugel v. George Easley Co.

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided September 10, 1999No. S-8417PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

EASTAUGH, Justice.

I. INTRODUCTION

We must decide here whether a permanent total disability settlement disqualifies an employee from subsequent disability claims. We hold that it does not and therefore remand for further consideration of the employee’s claim.

II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

John Lindekugel suffered two on-the-job injuries while working for different employers. In 1976 he was severely injured while employed by Fluor Alaska (Fluor). After multiple surgeries, his physician deemed him permanently and totally disabled (PTD). Lindekugel eventually settled a claim for workers’…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Tesoro Alaska Petroleum Co. v. Kenai Pipe Line Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ketchikan Gateway Borough v. SalingAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Yahara v. Construction & Rigging, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Alaska Industrial Board v. Chugach Electric Ass'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1958

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. George Easley Co. v. Estate of LindekugelAlaska Supreme Court · 2005

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API