George Easley Co. v. Estate of Lindekugel
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CARPENETI, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
The George Easley Company appeals the decision of the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board holding that it is liable for John Lindekugel’s injuries and that it is not entitled to the three offsets it sought from Lin-dekugel’s workers’ compensation award. We affirm the board’s finding that Easley is liable for Lindekugel’s disability under the last injurious exposure rule and its denial of Eas-ley’s petitions to modify the award.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
A. Facts
John Lindekugel suffered two separate accidents while working for two different employers.…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Guin v. HaAlaska Supreme Court · 1979
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- O'KEEFFE v. Aerojet-General Shipyards, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Miller v. ITT Arctic ServicesAlaska Supreme Court · 1978
- Gates v. City of Tenakee SpringsAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Barrington v. Alaska Communications Systems Group, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2009
- Seybert v. Cominco Alaska ExplorationAlaska Supreme Court · 2008
- Allen v. ALASKA OIL AND GAS CONSERV. COM'NAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Allen v. Alaska Oil & Gas Conservation CommissionAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Lucier v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018