Legal Opinion
State v. Urrea
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided May 30, 2017No. 2 CA-CR 2015-0416PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge:
¶ 1 After a jury trial, Francisco Urrea was convicted of transportation of a narcotic drug for sale and sentenced to a presumptive five-year prison term. On appeal, he renews arguments rejected by the trial court that the drugs found in his vehicle should have been suppressed and that the court imposed an inadequate sanction after finding a Batson1 violation. He also alleges, for the first time, that the court erroneously admitted improper “profile testimony” at trial. Finding no error, we affirm.
Factual and Procedural Background
¶ 2 We view the evidence in the light…
2Cases cited73 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Brown v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Pennsylvania v. MimmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Powers v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
68 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- State of Arizona v. Francisco Miguel UrreaArizona Supreme Court · 2018