Legal Opinion

Brown v. Savage

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided January 20, 1920No. 9547PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error from District Court, Pittsburg County ; W. 0. Crow, Assigned Judge. Action by W. H. Savage and others, partners, doing business under the firm name of W. H. Savage & Sons, against A. C. Brown and another. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendants bring error.

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

This action was brought by the plaintiffs to recover against the defendants upon an appeal bond. The plaintiffs’ petition alleged as follows:

“Comes now the plaintiffs and, for cause of action against the defendants, allege and state: (1) That plaintiffs are residents of Pittsburg county, state of Oklahoma, and reside at Blanco, Oklahoma, and are a partnership composed of W. H. Savage, M. T. Savage, and T. H. Savage, doing a mercantile business under the firm name of W. H. Savage & Sons; and that the defendants, A. C. Brown and M. Wallace, reside at Blanco, in Pittsburg county, state of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Irwin v. BackusCalifornia Supreme Court · 1864
  2. Bishop-Babcock-Becker Co. v. Estes Drug Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
  3. C. E. Sharp Lumber Co. v. Kansas Ice Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1914
  4. Blackwell Oil & Gas Co. v. WhitesidesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Smith-Wogan Hardware & Implement Co. v. Jos. W. Moon Buggy Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Atwater v. Lober, New York County Courts1930
  2. Simms Oil Co. v. ColquittCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API